<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Impact factors and Scimago JR compared</title>
	<link>http://wowter.net/2008/01/14/impact-factors-and-scimago-jr-compared/</link>
	<description>Comments on the library and information science world</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TeethTalk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Journal ranking alternatives to the journal impact factor</title>
		<link>http://wowter.net/2008/01/14/impact-factors-and-scimago-jr-compared/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>TeethTalk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Journal ranking alternatives to the journal impact factor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 06:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wowter.net/2008/01/14/impact-factors-and-scimago-jr-compared/#comment-238</guid>
		<description>[...]  Further reading about SJR  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;]  Further reading about SJR  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Besemer</title>
		<link>http://wowter.net/2008/01/14/impact-factors-and-scimago-jr-compared/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Besemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wowter.net/2008/01/14/impact-factors-and-scimago-jr-compared/#comment-218</guid>
		<description>We said we should continue online the discussion that we had informally about this.
My question was: what do you want to proof? You show a significant correlation between impact factors and the rank in Scimago. It is still better if you omit "outlying" results (I remember from the time when I did research on cocoa pollinating midges that that usually  did the trick :=)) 
It seems to indicate that Impact factors and Scimago ranks are to some degree interchangeable, but we should know more about the nature of the outliers.
Maybe it is good if more people from the readership of this blog would do comparable tests for their field of work

Hugo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We said we should continue online the discussion that we had informally about this.<br />
My question was: what do you want to proof? You show a significant correlation between impact factors and the rank in Scimago. It is still better if you omit &#8220;outlying&#8221; results (I remember from the time when I did research on cocoa pollinating midges that that usually  did the trick :=))<br />
It seems to indicate that Impact factors and Scimago ranks are to some degree interchangeable, but we should know more about the nature of the outliers.<br />
Maybe it is good if more people from the readership of this blog would do comparable tests for their field of work</p>
<p>Hugo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

